Tompkins

Tompkins v. Davidow

Good Law
1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 68·27 Cal. App. 327·149 P. 788
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1915Civ. No. 1355.California2,051 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Plaintiff brought the action, in his own behalf and as assignee of other parties, to recover five thousand dollars paid as a deposit upon a contract for the sale and purchase of certain real estate situated on Bryant Street near Fifth Street in San Francisco. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and defendant had judgment, from which and from the order denying his motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.

The transaction shown by the findings of the court was as follows: On March 28, 1906, defendant employed George 0. Boardman, Jr., and T. D. Boardman, copartners as Board-man Brothers Co., engaged in business as real estate agents, “as his agents to procure for him a purchaser for the real property hereafter described, for an agreed compensation, and they thereupon accepted such employment”; that, on said last named date, pursuant to such employment, they represented to defendant that they had found a purchaser for defendant’s said real property, one L. A. Steiger; that, believing said representation and relying thereon, defendant did, on said March 28, 1906, enter into a contract with L. A. Steiger for the sale and purchase of the real estate mentioned in said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.