S. C. Smith Estate v. J. M. Dunn Auto Co.

Bad Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 434·36 Cal. App. 467·172 P. 415
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1918Civ. No. 2108.California485 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

The appellant was the lessor under a lease made to the Mason & Flickinger Auto Company, which assigned the instrument to the J. M. Dunn Auto Company, the respondent. The latter corporation occupied the premises covered by the lease for more than two years and then, in turn, assigned it to one Lunceford. Rent was paid until some months after this last assignment, but a default in payment then followed and the present action was the result. Judgment went for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals.

The action was commenced against the respondent as if it were the original lessee, under the claim that it was but the Mason & Flickinger Auto Company under another name; the contention of appellant being that the formation of the respondent was merely a reorganization of the older corporation, the one being substituted in the place of the other and taking up the business formerly conducted by it. As a matter of fact, the respondent did take a transfer of the business and assets of the Mason & Flickinger Auto Company.

The sole point presented by appellant is whether certain findings of fact are supported by the evidence. These findings were, first, that it was not true that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.