Collier

Collier v. Johnson

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 147·79 Cal. App. 322·249 P. 217
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 1926Docket No. 3173.California1,794 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

This is an action to quiet title and to ¡recover possession of certain real estate. Plaintiff had judgment upon the pleadings and the defendant Johnson [appeals.

The plaintiff’s complaint alleges that on the thirty-first lay of May, 1920, the plaintiff let the defendant Johnson [into the possession of the Oregon Bar mining claim, together with certain improvements thereon, describing the Situation of the claim; that on or about the month of ipril, 1922, the defendant Johnson let one F. W. Edsall |nto possession of said property without the consent of the ilaintiff. Edsall was made a defendant in the action, but íe is not an appellant here. The complaint further alleges |hat on the thirty-first day of May, 1920, the plaintiff ras the owner of said mining claim and of all improveíents thereon and was the owner of said mining claim at Ihe time of the beginning of the action; that the defendants and each of them claim an estate or interest in said property adversely to the plaintiff; that the claims of the lefendants were without right, etc. The prayer of the (omplaint is as follows: “That defendants and each of íem be required to set forth the nature of his claim; that 111 adverse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.