Ricca

California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Ricca

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 168·79 Cal. App. 212·249 P. 41
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 1926Docket No. 5536.California598 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued as assignee for collection upon a promissory note for $3,750 executed and delivered by defendant to the Virden Packing Company on October 15, 1921, in renewal off a former note in the same amount given as part payment of the purchase price of forty shares of the capital stock of the packing company. The defendant answered admitting the execution of the note and setting up the special defense of fraud in the original transaction. The cause was tried before the court, sitting without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff as prayed.

The facts pleaded in the answer upon which the defendant based his claim of fraud were that the agent of the Virden Packing Company represented to him that the company was doing a large and profitable business and that the actual value and the market value of its capital stock was $100 per share and that it would soon thereafter be worth $125 per share. It was then alleged that these representations were false, and were known to be false by the agent, that they were made with the intent to deceive the defendant, and that he -had no knowledge of the actual or the prospective value of the stock, but relied entirely upon the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.