O'Malley

O'Malley v. Town of Sebastopol

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 36·24 Cal. App. 32·139 P. 1082
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1914Civ. No. 1148.California863 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The complaint is in two counts, the second being upon an assigned claim. Plaintiff and his assignor, on the first day of October, 1910, and for some time prior thereto, were each the owner of and conducting a saloon business in said town of Sebastopol. Up to the first of August there was in effect an ordinance under the provisions of which the license-fee for the privilege of conducting a saloon business in the town was fifty dollars per quarter, payable in advance upon the first day of January and every three months thereafter.

It appears from the complaint that, upon the sixth day of June, 1910, the said town duly adopted an ordinance fixing the saloon license at one thousand dollars per year and providing that no license shall be issued for a longer or less time than one year and that “all license-fees shall be paid semi-annually in advance one-half on January 1st and one-half on July 1st of each year.” It was further provided that “all ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed in so far as they conflict with this ordinance” and “this ordinance shall be in force and effect on and after the 1st day of August, 1910.”

It further appears from the complaint “that upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.