Ferguson

Ferguson v. Marsh

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 412·37 Cal. App. 482·174 P. 678
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 1918Civ. No. 2173.California1,362 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

The judgment in this ease was in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant John D. Marsh has appealed therefrom.

In the year 1913 the defendant Marsh was the contractor named in a contract made with the state of California, which provided for the construction of certain road work on a public highway in the county of Los Angeles. In the prosecution of this work it was necessary that there should be used a large quantity of rock and sand. Appellant arranged for the procurement of the rock and sand, which was to be delivered in cars at several stations in the vicinity of the highway on which the work was to be done. Appellant then contracted with three persons, Anway, Bente, and Miller, to haul the rock and sand, as it arrived at these different stations, to the places where the same might be needed. This contract last mentioned was in writing, providing that Anway, Bente, and Miller should do all the work and furnish the tools, implements, motor trucks, and labor necessary for the expeditious handling of the cars and the delivery of the rock and sand. The contract also provided that Anway, Bente, and Miller should “save said first party [appellant John D. Marsh] harmless against any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.