Lloyd
Pacific Slope Securities Co. v. Lloyd
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Sturtevant, J.
The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant to recover a judgment for moneys had and received, the trial court entered a judgment in its favor, and the defendant has appealed and has brought up the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.
The pleadings contained numerous irrelevant matters, the findings are subject to the same criticism, and much irrelevant and immaterial testimony was received. We shall touch on only those matters that seem to us to he material.
For a time prior to the month of December, 1909, the Pacific Slope Securities Company and the Pacific Surety Company were competitors doing business in the state of California. In the early part of December a campaign was launched looking toward the purchase of the stock of the Pacific Surety Company by its rival, the plaintiff in this case. By pledging its own properties, and by others pledging their properties, $475,000 was borrowed and placed on deposit in the Western National Bank of San Francisco. On the thirteenth day of December, 1909, the board of directors of the plaintiff corporation passed a resolution as follows: “Resolved, "That the Western National Bank of San Francisco be, and it is hereby…