Murdock

Murdock v. Murdock

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 201·49 Cal. App. 775·194 P. 762
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 1920Civ. No. 2116.California4,840 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

This is an appeal from a decree in favor of the plaintiff rescinding and setting aside, on the grounds of misrepresentation and fraud, a certain instrument in writing executed by the plaintiff to the defendant, and is upon the judgment-roll alone.

The complaint is of considerable length, but it will sub-serve the purpose of this decision to present the averments herein in substance. It may here properly be stated that the court’s findings are in all vital particulars in strict accord with the allegations of the complaint, and, therefore, while we shall state the facts herein as they are set out in the complaint, it will he understood that such statement will embrace substantially the facts as they were found by the court.

The plaintiff and the defendant are, and at all times mentioned in the complaint were, husband and wife. On or about the sixteenth day of July, 1916, and for a long time prior thereto, the plaintiff was the sole owner,' in her separate right, of approximately 160 contos, Brazilian currency, which is equal approximately to $37,500 in the coin of the United States of America, the same being then and thereafter on deposit with and held by Queiros, Barros &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.