Cheda

Cheda v. Southern Pacific Co.

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 3·22 Cal. App. 373·134 P. 717
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1913Civ. No. 1343.California1,704 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

The action was one by plaintiff to restrain the defendants from obstructing or continuing to obstruct a certain creek, and from diverting water therefrom, and for damages. The facts are these: Plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land in - San Luis Obispo County through which Stenner Creek runs. This Stenner Creek is a stream formed from various tributaries, the two principal ones arising at certain springs, one thereof from Serrano spring and the other from Dyer spring. Dyer spring is situate upon land owned by the defendant corporation, and from it a stream flows through defendant’s lands and those of other proprietors until its junction with the waters flowing from Serrano spring, from which point the stream is known as Stenner Creek. Plaintiff’s land, lies below the junction and below lands belonging to one Herrera. The defendant corporation, in the year 1894, built a dam and commenced the diversion of water from the tributary flowing from Serrano spring, and continued the use of this water for purposes other than that of irrigation from that date until 1903, at which time, having acquired the lands upon which Dyer spring is situated, it abandoned the rights acquired below…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.