Fraser

People v. Fraser

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 182·23 Cal. App. 82·137 P. 276
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1913Crim. No. 462.California1,080 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

The defendant in this case was charged in an information filed in the city and county of San Francisco, with having violated section 115 of the Penal Code, which reads as follows: “Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, or registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.”

The instrument referred to in the charging part of the information was set out in full, and purports to be a duplicate certificate of birth signed by the defendant, wherein he, as the attending physician, certified that on September 10, 1910, he attended the birth of a male child in the city and county of San Francisco, named Charles Eugene Slingsby; that the name of the father of said child was Charles Henry Reynard Slingsby, and that the maiden name of the mother of said child was Dorothy Morgan Cutler.

The information further alleged that the defendant unlawfully, willfully, feloniously, and knowingly procured said cer tificate to be filed, registered, and recorded in the office of the state board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.