Estate of Watson

Salberg v. Coombs

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 453·77 Cal. App. 493·246 P. 1087
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 1926Docket No. 5622.California440 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

Josephine B. Watson, a resident of Los Angeles, died August 6, 1923, and left a holographic will. The will was admitted to probate and thereafter this proceeding was commenced under the provisions of section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to determine heirship and the beneficiaries under the will. The trial court made and entered its order in favor of the respondents, and Ruth L. Salberg and Emily K. Eiermann, grandnieces, have appealed from the order.

The appeal presents one point and that is whether grandnieces were included as beneficiaries under the terms of the will. The will, as above stated, was holographic and was as follows:

One of decedent’s nieces, Mrs. Lowry, died in 1907, leaving her surviving two daughters, B.uth Salberg and Emily Eiermann, the appellants. The decedent made her will on April 21, 1923, and died on August 6, 192'3.

The appellants cite section 1310 of the Civil Code and argue that as their mother was a niece, but is dead, as her descendants they are entitled to inherit the portion which their mother would have inherited. In support of their position they cite many authorities from other jurisdictions. (Ke hl v. Taylor, 275 Ill. 346 [Ann. Cas.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.