Ryan

Ryan v. Busick

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 94·50 Cal. App. 26·194 P. 514
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 1920Civ. No. 2203.California343 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Prewett, J.

This is a proceeding auxiliary to a matter pending in this court wherein the above-named petitioners prayed for a writ of mandate against the superior court and Honorable C. O. Busick, judge thereof, which prayer was denied on August 2-5th last. In that proceeding a restraining order pendente lite was issued. A few days after the entry of judgment denying the prayer of the petition the respondents proceeded to enforce the decree in the original action, the subject matter of the application for the writ and restraining order.

Petitioners filed in this court their affidavit on proceedings to bring respondents into contempt for failure to observe the terms of the restraining order. An order to show cause was issued on August 30th last and the matter has remained on the calendar since that date awaiting the filing of briefs by the respective parties. The matter ripened for decision only on November 10th.

[1] The petitioners contend that, as the judgment of a district .court of appeal does not become final until the lapse of the constitutional period of thirty days after rendition, the temporary restraining order which accompanied the alternative writ of mandate in this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.