John H. Meier v. William Keller and Robert Bork, John H. Meier v. William Keller, John H. Meier v. Devoe Heaton

Good Law
521 F.2d 548
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 197574-1182, 74-1673, 74-1910California3,858 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duniway, J.

These appeals arise from separate actions which Meier filed in two different district courts to prevent Suckling, an attorney who had done legal work in connection with Meier’s sales of certain, mining claims, from giving grand jury testimony and cooperating with a federal investigation of possible tax evasion and conspiracy charges against Meier. Both complaints, the first filed in the Central District of California, the second in the District of Nevada, alleged that Suckling had violated the attorney-client privilege by providing information and certain documents to federal agents, and that Meier’s Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights would be violated if the documents and Suckling’s testimony were presented to a grand jury. Named as defendants in each case were Suckling, the Attorney General of the United States, and the United States Attorney for the forum district. The prayers were for a temporary restraining order, a preliminary and a permanent injunction against Suckling, prohibiting him from appearing before any grand jury, suppressing all leads and evidence derived from his cooperation, and compelling immediate return to Meier of all documents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.