Cormac

Cormac v. Murphy

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 286·58 Cal. App. 366·208 P. 360
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1922Civ. No. 4060.California1,631 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in an action brought to recover the sum of five hundred dollars alleged to be due plaintiffs for legal services rendered by them in connection with the settlement of the estate of the deceased son of defendant.

On September 10, 1920, plaintiffs, who are practicing attorneys at law, with offices located in San Francisco, received a letter dated August 19, 1920, from Patrick O’Leary, a solicitor residing at Bantry, county of Cork, Ireland, concerning the estate of Jeremiah J. Murphy, deceased, which estate was then pending probate in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. In that letter it was, among other things, stated that Murphy died in San Francisco, leaving an estate, consisting of money and shares of stock of undetermined value; that Murphy was survived by a mother and brother residing in Ireland, for whom O’Leary was acting, and a sister residing in the United States; that the public administrator had taken charge of the assets of said estate. Continuing the letter said: “What the money and shares amount to I do not know, but I want you to make inquiries and let me know,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.