Schmidt

Schmidt v. Denning

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 36·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 404·3 P.2d 322
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1931Docket No. 7994.California1,086 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturteyant, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants to obtain a decree setting aside a purported homestead. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs the defendants have appealed.

To understand the points made by the respective parties it is necessary to briefly state chronologically the facts of the case. On April 24, 1924, the defendants owned the lot and the building thereon on which the declaration of homestead was subsequently filed. The property is designated by numbers 131A-1316-1318 and 1320 Colton Street, Los Angeles. On the same date the plaintiffs owned a lot in Contra Costa County situated near the city of Oakland. The plaintiffs and defendants executed a contract of exchange. The plaintiffs conveyed to the defendants their lot and defendants conveyed to the plaintiffs their lot in Los Angeles. As a part of the consideration the plaintiffs executed to the defendants a mortgage in the sum of $4,000 and they also executed a deed of trust to secure a promissory note in the further sum of $4,500. On June 18, 1925, the plaintiffs commenced action No. 164,203, Los Angeles Records, against the defendants. At the same time they caused to be recorded a lis pendens. That…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.