Lamia

Lamia v. Tozzi

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 445·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1017·29 P.2d 324
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 1934Docket No. 8186.California954 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

In an action for commissions alleged to have accrued for services rendered under a contract to obtain an agreement to furnish to the defendant and appellant fifty carloads of oranges, the latter appealed from a judgment founded upon affirmative findings of fact.

In the interest of economy of time and discussion a common ground of the parties may be stated as established. The plaintiff, a fruit broker, was requested by the defendant to buy for the latter fifty carloads of Valencia oranges, preseason, the seller to pay broker’s commission, but first to advise as to name of shipper and brand obtainable before closing the purchase; in an interchange of correspondence the broker stated after negotiations that he had located and obtained from the Highlands Orchard Company, of Highland, California, for Tozzi, fifty carloads of Cherokee brand oranges at six cents per pound for shipment one car daily, terms $200 on each car to be deposited at once on confirmation, balance cash when shipped, plus brokerage; the buyer after examination of said brand wrote and telegraphed that he would give the quoted price and make said deposit upon signing contract, “accept fifty cars Valencias, price,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.