MacBride

MacBride v. Schoen

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 321·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1152·8 P.2d 888
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 1932Docket No. 524.California1,378 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

This is an action against a notary and the surety upon her notarial bond to recover damages alleged to have been suffered through the making of a false certificate of acknowledgment. A demurrer to the second amended complaint, filed by the surety, was sustained without leave to amend and from a judgment which followed in favor of the surety, this appeal is taken.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of certain described real property; that she entered into a contract with one Lalor by which she was to receive $5,000 worth of stock of the United States Signal Corporation and $3,000 in cash, in exchange for her own promissory note in favor of Lalor for $8,000, secured by a- deed of trust on the real property described; that she executed and delivered to Lalor the said note and deed of trust, but that she did not acknowledge the execution of the deed of trust; that Lalor never intended to perform and did not perform his part of the agreement; that Lalor presented the deed of trust to the defendant Schoen who attached the usual certificate of acknowledgment thereto; that said acknowledgment is false in that the plaintiff never appeared before the notary; that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.