Duerr

Duerr v. Sloan.

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 126·40 Cal. App. 653·181 P. 407
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 15, 1919Civ. No. 2743.California1,815 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Brittain, J.

The defendants, substituted as executors of her will on the death of Sarah A. Bryan, appeal from a judgment on an account stated, for architects’ services, assigned by O’Brien & Werner to the plaintiff.

In 1911 Mrs. Bryan owned an unimproved lot in San Francisco upon which was erected an apartment house of six stories, known as St. Anthony building. It cost ninety thousand dollars and was accepted September 23, 1913. On September 29, 1913, a statement was sent to the office of W. A. Sloan reading as follows:

The first set of plans, for which, on the statement, there was a charge of two thousand five hundred dollars, was prepared by the architects, together with specifications for a class A building upon the order of Jesse Bryan and Sloan. Bids for the construction of the building were being received when Jesse Bryan died. J. S. Bryan, a brother of Jesse Bryan, then instructed the architects to call the matter off and that they would take it up later on. Subsequently Sloan and J. S. Bryan did take the matter up with the architects and ordered the preparation of plans for the cheaper class C building which was erected. The first set of plans was used as a basis of the second set,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.