Hargrove

Hargrove v. Henderson

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 667·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 262·292 P. 148
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 1930Docket No. 4134.California5,189 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Luttrell, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants, who are husband and wife, brought this action against defendants and respondents to recover damages for fraudulent representations made as to the quantity and boundary lines of a certain tract of land sold by them to plaintiffs in the county of Orange, state of California.

Plaintiff A. E. Hargrove engaged in the real estate business in said county in the year 1919. On March 1, 1920, he entered into a copartnership with defendants Harry O. Henderson and J. Lloyd Moore and a man by the name of Wagner. This copartnership was formed to conduct a real estate business.

At the time of the formation of such copartnership, the defendants Henderson, owned a triangular piece of land in said Orange County, across which the Southern Pacific Company owned a right of way 200 feet wide. This right of way had come to said company through a grant from the United States in 1872. The right of way divided said triangular parcel of land owned by the Hendersons into two separate parcels. The triangular piece, including the right of way, contained 4.78 acres of land. Excluding the right of way, it contained 3.75 acres, the area of the right of way being 1.03 acres.

Some time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.