Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. King Land & Improvement Co.

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 458·126 P. 372
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 1912Civ. No. 1085.California1,255 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

James, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff on a promissory note made for the principal sum of $10,000 executed by the King Land & Improvement Co. and W. J. King, and guaranteed by respondents G. W. Burleigh, C. R. Ward and Robert McFadden. Judgment was in favor of the respondents mentioned. The appeal is on the part of plaintiff and is taken from the judgment and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

In October, 1907, plaintiff, acting as trustee for the owners of a considerable acreage in the Rancho Sausal Redondo, in Los Angeles county, made an agreement with W. J. King, whereby it was provided that the said King should be given an option to purchase the real estate so held in trust for the total amount of $130,000. A similar agreement had previously been made between the same parties, but King, having failed to fulfill the obligations thereof on his part to be performed, a new arrangement was consummated and a second writing executed. In this writing it was first recited that it was the desire to give a further extension of the option to King, and that the original agreement was abrogated and annulled, and it was then recited:

The promissory notes were duly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.