Lindsey

Lindsey v. Butte

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 831·96 Cal. App. 465·274 P. 428
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 1929Docket No. 3642.California2,246 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Finch, J.

The plaintiff was given judgment against all the defendants for the sum of $6,000 as damages for the conversion of an automobile and the further sum of $250 as compensation for time and money expended in pursuit of the automobile. There are two appeals from the judgment; one by the defendant Heilman Commercial Trust and Savings Bank and the other by defendants Butte, Barker, and Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc.

October 19, 1923, the plaintiff and E. L. Butler entered into a conditional sale contract, in the usual form, by the terms of which the former agreed to purchase from the latter a Duesenberg automobile for $5,000, of which sum $2,000 was paid at the execution of the contract and the balance of $3,000 was to be paid in ten equal monthly installments, commencing November 19, 1923. The contract contained the following:

There is testimony showing the facts enumerated herein. Both parties to the contract were automobile dealers in Los Angeles. The automobile was immediately delivered to the plaintiff. Butler immediately sold and assigned the contract to the defendant bank for the amount of the unpaid installments. The bank mailed notice to the plaintiff of the assignment, but the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.