Berkeley Bank of Savings & Trust Co. v. Miller

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 143·23 Cal. App. 315·137 P. 1101
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 1913Civ. No. 1395.California892 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, Herman Murphy, Ella M. Murphy, and the Progressive Investment Company, from a judgment and order denying a new trial in an action wherein a decree was made and entered, foreclosing a real property mortgage executed by the defendant Herman Murphy to the corporation plaintiff, as security for the payment of a promissory note in the sum of six thousand five hundred dollars. All of the other defendants were made parties to the action because, as alleged in the complaint, they had or claimed to have some interest in the mortgaged premises which was subsequent and subordinate to the lien of the mortgage.

The execution and nonpayment of the note and mortgage were admitted hy the answers of each and all of the defendants. The defendants William Miller, G. A. Murphy, George C. Richards, and the Black-White Company, by their answers admitted that whatever interest they had in the mortgaged premises arose subsequent to the execution of the mortgage out of attachments or judgment liens in other actions which they had instituted against the defendant Herman Murphy.

When the case was called for trial each and all of the defendants stipulated in open court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.