Moore

Moore v. Groftholdt

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 714·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 304·103 P. 149
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 1909Civ. No. 628.California1,248 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Allen, J.

In the action instituted by plaintiff against defendants the complaint filed set out a certain contract and agreement between plaintiff and defendants, under which it was claimed that defendants obtained possession of a certain band of cattle the ownership and right of possession to which was in plaintiff. It is alleged that under this agreement defendants undertook to transfer certain real property to plain tiff, in consideration of which plaintiff agreed to deliver the band of cattle mentioned and to pay defendants $250 in addition. That plaintiff surrendered possession of the cattle under an agreement that the title thereto should remain in plaintiff until the transfer of said real estate; that at the same time plaintiff loaned to defendants $100. And it is averred that defendants failed to transfer said real estate, or to repay said $100 so loaned, upon demand. Judgment is accordingly sought for the recovery of the personal property; or, in case restitution cannot be had, that plaintiff have judgment for the value thereof, to wit: $450; and, also, $250 damages for the wrongful detention, and $100, the amount of the loan.

Defendants admit the contract set out in the complaint,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.