Hewitt

Hewitt v. Klages

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 892·92 Cal. App. 596·268 P. 694
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 1928Docket No. 3543.California636 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Finch, J.

March 12, 1924, the plaintiff conveyed real property in the city of Los Angeles to the defendant Minnie Klages in exchange for a leasehold interest in an apartment house and the furniture and household goods therein. The bill of sale of such personal property provides that it is “to be free and clear of all encumbrance except a mortgage of $1,875 which the party of the second part agrees to assume and pay.” It was stipulated at the trial that Mrs. Klages, prior to and at the time of the exchange, “represented that it was clear of all encumbrance except $1,875.” There was at the time another mortgage lien on the property for a large amount, of which the plaintiff had no knowledge. Early in May, 1924, the plaintiff discovered the existence of this other lien. She immediately informed Mrs. Klages thereof and the latter indignantly denied that there was such a lien. On the 20th of that month Mrs. Klages executed a deed of gift of the real property in question to her daughter, defendant Agnes Jarvis, and conveyed all other property owned by her to her sons. On the 28th of the month the plaintiff served notice of rescission on the ground of the false representation mentioned and offered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.