Myers

Myers v. Canepa

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 398·37 Cal. App. 556·174 P. 903
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 1918Civ. No. 1493.California1,468 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

The cause is before us on rehearing. The following statement of the case is taken from the original opinion, written by Justice Hart, affirming the judgment:

In the petition for rehearing much stress is laid upon the erroneously assumed fact that in upholding the judgment “this court, in its opinion, considers matters entirely outside of the record. ’ ’ . Appellants wholly misconceive the grounds on which the decision is rested. While error was declared in overruling the demurrer, the decision was placed entirely upon well-settled rules of procedure where presumptions and intendments come into play in support of the judgment on appeals on the judgment-roll alone. It is with these presumptions and intendments in support of the judgment we are alone concerned, for appellants insist that no presumptions or intendments can deprive them of a right to a reversal of the judgment for the obvious imperfections of the complaint pointed out in their demurrer.

Referring to the demurrer interposed to the complaint: It may be conceded that the effect of the averments of the fourth amended complaint is improperly to unite a cause of action in favor of plaintiff personally with a cause of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.