Regalia

Regalia v. Mariani

Good Law
100 Cal. App. 1·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 363·279 P. 455
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 1929Docket No. 6422.California2,166 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

The above two actions wherein Fillipio Regalia is plaintiff and respondent and Tony Mariani is defendant and appellant in one and in the other Tony Mariani is plaintiff and appellant and Fillipio Regalia is defendant and respondent, were consolidated in the lower court and tried together and a single judgment entered, the court adjudging that Fillipio Regalia have and recover from Tony Mariani the sum of $1500, together with interest and costs, and that a contract entered into between the parties be rescinded, canceled and delivered up to Fillipio Regalia, and that Tony Mariani have and recover from Fillipio Regalia $300 as rent for the use of certain premises. The appellant has appealed from that part of the judgment wherein the court adjudged that Fillipio Regalia have rescission of the agreement of purchase and sale, and the return to him of $1500; that Tony Mariani has not sustained damages and that Fillipio Regalia is entitled to costs.

Respondent Regalia brought an action against appellant Mariani asking for the rescission of an agreement of purchase and sale of a certain restaurant business and the personal property used as equipment therein and the return of $1500, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.