In Re Leuschen
Opinion
lead Opinion
Barnard, J.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was charged, in a complaint filed in the Justice’s Court of Fullerton, Orange County, with violating section 476a of the Penal Code by issuing and passing six certain checks with the knowledge that he did not have sufficient funds in nor credit with the banks upon which they were drawn to meet the same in full. After a preliminary hearing a commitment was issued holding him to answer.
This petition is based upon the contention that no reasonable or probable cause was shown, since the evidence is entirely insufficient to show any intent to defraud. It is well settled that the gist of the offense here charged is the fraudulent intent and there must be both an intent to, defraud and a present knowledge upon the part of the one issuing such a check that he has neither funds in nor credit with the bank upon which it is drawn to meet the same when presented (Pen. Code. sec. 476a; In re Scott, 85 Cal. App. 170 [ 259 Pac. 101 ]; People v. Owens, 57 Cal. App. 84 [ 206 Pac. 473 ]; People v. Frey, 165 Cal. 140 [ 131 Pac. 127 ]; People v. Routh, 182 Cal. 561 [ 189 Pac. 436 ]).