Bullard

Bullard v. Rosenberg

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 542·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1067·20 P.2d 104
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1933Docket No. 839.California1,308 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Campbell, J.

This is an action brought to quiet th'e title of plaintiff to certain real property situate in the county of Tulare and also to certain real property situate in the county of Los Angeles. The complaint is in the usual form of such actions. The answer of defendant Jennie Rosenberg contains a general denial of the title of plaintiff and alleges in general terms that said defendant owns an interest in the property superior to any right, title or interest of the plaintiff. As a separate defense the answer alleged that the right, title and interest of plaintiff is subject to the lien of a writ of attachment issued out of the county of Los Angeles, state of California, in an action wherein the defendant and appellant here is plaintiff and one Kate A. Bullard is defendant, and alleges that at the date of the levy of the writ said Kate A. Bullard had an interest in the property superior to that of the plaintiff. The plaintiff relies, in proof of his title, upon a deed executed and delivered subsequent to the levy of the writ of attachment.

Two questions are involved in the appeal: (1) Whether a good and valid lien on the property is shown by the evidence introduced by appellant at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.