Bond

Bond v. Walters

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 219·38 Cal. App. 245·175 P. 909
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1918Civ. Nos. 2535, 2536.California670 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

These suits were brought to have a trust declared in certain lands. The complaints are identical in every respect except the names of the plaintiffs and the description of the real property involved; and from a stipulation contained in the transcript it appears that it is agreed that the decision in one case shall he determinative of the other.

Plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court after the entry of the default of the plaintiffs, which in each instance was for failure on their part to amend the complaint after the sustaining of general demurrers to the same.

In the complaint in the Bond case plaintiff seeks to obtain a decree, adjudging that the defendant, to whom a United States patent for the lands described in the complaint was issued, holds the title to such land in trust for the plaintiff, and prays for a decree directing the defendant to execute a .proper conveyance to him of the land in question.

While it is true that courts of equity will entertain proceedings to decree that persons who have received and hold patents to land hold the same in trust for the true owner, a plaintiff in such action must show by his complaint that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.