Brundige

Black v. Brundige

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 641·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 673·13 P.2d 999
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 1932Docket No. 8285.California2,099 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Beaumont, J.

In 1925 Roy S. Brundige was a builder of houses in the vicinity of Los Angeles. There were five lots in Beverly Hills he believed desirable for his business. The value of these lots was $25,000, but they could be purchased for $19,750 cash. He interviewed Lud wig G. B. Erb, respondent herein, for the purpose of obtaining funds with which to buy the lots. A contract was entered into on September 16, 1925, between respondent and Brundige. This agreement stated that Brundige had applied to respondent for money with which to purchase certain lots, describing them. Respondent agreed to acquire the lots (five) in Brundige's name, for the erection of houses thereon. Brundige agreed to finance the building of the houses by means of “first”.mortgages upon the lots and improvements, and further agreed to pay or cause to be paid to respondent $5,000 from the proceeds of the sale of each lot. Five promissory notes, bearing interest at seven per cent per annum, each secured by a trust deed, were to evidence this indebtedness. Each trust deed was to be subject to a first mortgage note not to exceed $6,500. The mortgage note in each instance was to mature thirty days aftér the date of maturity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.