Benson

Benson v. Hamilton

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 331·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 454·14 P.2d 876
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1932Docket No. 8528.California1,727 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

In October, 1928, the plaintiff Martin Benson and the defendant F. J. White, each being then the owners of certain interests in real property, orally negotiated on certain terms (questions as to whether these terms embraced certain promises on the part of F. J. White and if such promises were made whether they were made without any intention of performing them have given rise to this action) an exchange of their properties. The properties were encumbered, the encumbrances taking different forms. As the result of such oral negotiation, deeds and transfers were on October 27, 1928, executed and delivered by the respective parties, and with the object of equalizing the values of the properties exchanged, Martin Benson made and delivered to F. J. White a promissory note payable in thirty days for $250. At the time of the said negotiation there were on the property of White certain special improvements or equipment consisting of a gas-tank, a pump, a power saw, pipe, wire and electrical fixtures that White had been making a special use of, and also on this property there was interest due in the amount of $50.49, and a personal property tax, a lien upon the premises, in the amount of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.