Rowe

Rowe v. Rennick

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 576·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 49·297 P. 603
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1931Docket No. 4189.California4,260 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

The plaintiff had judgment against the defendant in the sum of $10,800, for and on account of personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision alleged to be due to the negligence of the defendant. Prom this judgment the defendant appeals.

The complaint alleges that on or about the seventeenth day of March, 1929, the plaintiff was riding in a certain automobile which was being driven in a southerly direction along the state highway running between the towns of Pair-field and Cordelia, in the county of Solano; that on the same day the defendant was driving an automobile in a general northerly direction along the same highway; that the defendant so carelessly, negligently and unlawfully drove and operated his automobile as to cause the same to collide with the automobile in which the plaintiff was riding, thereby causing the plaintiff serious personal injuries, which injuries were alleged to be as follows: A fracture and dislocation of the coccyx; a fracture of the fifth lumbar vertebra on the right side in the lamina; and severe bruises of the body and legs. The complaint further alleges that by reason of such injuries plaintiff has been unable to attend to her ordinary duties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.