Poe

Poe v. Francis

Caution
132 Cal. App. 330·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 388·22 P.2d 801
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 1933Docket No. 7634.California1,477 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Parker, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, which judgment was so rendered in favor of plaintiff after answer filed.

The complaint is in three counts, each founded upon a promissory note alleged to be unpaid. The first count sets up the execution and delivery of a certain promissory note payable to one Huttig, the assignment, transfer and indorsement thereof to plaintiff before maturity and for value, partial payment and the nonpayment of balance. The second count contains the same allegations with reference to another promissory note. The third count sets up a third note and contains the same allegations with reference to execution, delivery and nonpayment. The allegation of transfer and assignment to plaintiff makes no reference to time of transfer, whether upon or after maturity, or whether any consideration attended the assignment and transfer to plaintiff. We shall consider the answer with reference to each count.

Count One: Defendant admits the execution and delivery of the note as alleged. The answer then proceeds: Defendant is informed and believes and on that ground denies the assignment to plaintiff and alleges that the payee of the note did not, prior to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.