Hubbard

Hubbard v. Lee

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 92·6 Cal. App. 602·92 P. 744
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 1907Civ. No. 358.California2,635 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

Action to foreclose lien for materials.

Findings were filed, upon which judgment was entered for defendant Lee as to the lien claimed on his land. This appeal is from the judgment, and an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. It appears that in April, 1905, defendants Hastings, copartners, herein called the contractors, entered into a written contract with defendant Lee, the owner of the lots, by the terms of which they agreed to furnish materials and labor and build for Lee three houses for the sum of $6,700. This contract was never filed for record in the office of the county recorder. The contractors entered' upon the performance of the contract, and at their request Hubbard and Carmichael Bros., the assignors of plaintiff, furnished lumber, mill work and building materials, which were used in the construction of the houses, of the value of $2,894.90, of which sum $1,000 was paid by the contractors and no more. The buildings were completed in October, 1905, but no notice of completion was ever filed in the recorder’s office. On June 29, 1906, the assignors of plaintiff served upon Lee a notice in writing, stating that $1,894.90 was still due them for materials…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.