Loescher

Loescher v. Whipple

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 782·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 1089·286 P. 741
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1930Docket No. 6898.California1,532 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McKENZIE, J.

For two years prior to the 5th of September, 1924, Katie Loescher had in her custody a grandson nine years of age, named Jack Loescher. It is not clear why the boy was living with his grandmother instead of with his father, E. F. Loescher. The boy was somewhat mentally deficient, and the grandmother appears to have been very solicitous of his future welfare; and having in mind that he might never be capable of providing for himself, she conceived the idea of giving the boy, through the medium of a trustee, a productive tract of land in Fresno County, consisting of about forty acres. This plan of making provision for her unfortunate grandchild had

been in Mrs. Loescher’s mind for some time, and on the fifth day of September, 1924, she caused to be executed a deed, which conveyed the real property involved in this action to her son, E. P. Loescher, who is the father of Jack Loescher. On the same day and as part of the same transaction, but by separate instrument, a declaration of trust relating to this property was executed by E. P. Loescher as trustee; and Jack Loescher was named therein as beneficiary. The trust agreement was evidently prepared by one who had knowledge of such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.