Stevenson

Gutleben Bros. v. Stevenson

Good Law
92 Cal. App. 513·268 P. 379
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 1928Docket No. 6329.California2,001 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The defendant is the owner of the Hotel Miramar Annex at Santa Monica. Before building the hotel he employed an architect to draw plans and prepare specifications. Afterwards he engaged the plaintiff as manager and superintendent to build the building. A written contract was drawn up, executed, and recorded. By the terms of the written contract the plaintiff undertook to superintend all of the building, etc., to make bimonthly statements of his transactions, to pay the bills, and thereafter to submit the vouchers to the owner. All of these things were done and the record presents no question on the subject. The plaintiff agreed that the building would not cost in excess of $428,686. It was also agreed that changes might be made when authorized by a written order from said architect.” It was further agreed that the compensation of the plaintiff would be $24,000, “that should the architect at any time during the progress of the work require and order any alterations, deviations from, additions to, or omissions from the work shown in said plans and specifications, the same shall in no way injuriously affect or make void this contract, but the difference in value for work or materials…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.