Pepper

Pepper v. Vedova

Good Law
1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 238·26 Cal. App. 406·147 P. 105
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1915Civ. No. 1445.California1,004 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

This is an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of a team of horses. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant willfully, falsely, fraudulently, and deceitfully stated and represented to the plaintiff the said team of horses of which he was then and there possessed “to be a well matched team, to work together under harness for wagon and general farm work, not balky, no bad habits, physically sound and without fault, blemish, disorder or disease”; that the plaintiff not being a horseman nor experienced in horses or in their purchase, relied and depended upon the defendant’s aforesaid representations, knowing nothing to the contrary regarding said team; that the representations of the defendant were false in a number of essential particulars set forth in the complaint, of all of which the defendant had full knowledge at the time the representations were made. The complaint was otherwise sufficient in point of form as to the requisites of an action for rescission. The defendant did. not demur to the complaint, but answered, specifically denying its averments, and the cause went to trial upon the issues thus presented.

The court found that the defendant, being possessed of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.