Brandenburger
Brandenburger v. Chipman
Opinion
lead Opinion
Weyand, J.
Charles C. Studarus and Charles C. Studarus, Jr., were copartners doing business as farmers, under the name of Charles Studarus & Son. On October 15, 1924, they filed their petition in bankruptcy in the United States district court for the northern district of California, and said partnership was on that day adjudicated a bankrupt. Their farming operations had, prior to the adjudication in bankruptcy, been conducted in Sacramento and Yolo Counties. The plaintiff above named, the trustee in bankruptcy, is the respondent herein, and he will be referred to hereafter as the trustee. Studarus & Son will be referred to as the bankrupts.
The trustee above named, by an amended complaint filed in the superior court of Sacramento County, on October 27, 1925, sought to recover from Eldon Chipman, the appellant, the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, which sum was by the trustee averred to be property of the estate of the bankrupt partnership, and illegally held by the defendant Eldon Chipman.
Judgment in the lower court was in favor of the trustee, and the defendant Chipman appeals to this court.
The complaint contains three causes of action. In the first cause of action it is alleged that…