Bristol

Bristol v. Hershey

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 289·7 Cal. App. 738·95 P. 1040
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1908Civ. No. 458.California1,757 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles county in favor of defendant rendered upon a hearing sustaining the demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend.

It appears from the second amended complaint that on August 1, 1902, defendant Hershey obtained a decree foreclosing a first mortgage executed by plaintiff on certain real estate, in which proceeding one Wills, the holder of a junior mortgage, was made a party, but to whom no affirmative relief was granted by the decree; that under this decree, on September 24, 1902, the premises were sold to Hershey for the full amount found due, together with accrued interest and costs; that the certificate of sale issued to Hershey was defective in that the premises sold were incorrectly described; that in such form the certificate was recorded in the recorder’s office of Los Angeles county, but not indexed; that subsequently the certificate was corrected, but the record thereof was not altered; that afterward, in December, 1902, Wills, the holder of the junior mortgage, brought an independent action against plaintiff in foreclosure, and such proceedings were had that on February 12, 1903,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.