Holmberg

Ott Hardware Co. v. Holmberg

Good Law
36 Cal. App. 402·179 P. 422
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1918Civ. 2494; Civ. 2440California1,230 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

James, J.

The controversy between the parties hereto having run a prolonged course through the trial and appellate courts, is again here on two appeals, both taken by the defendant. As the questions involved are practically the same in both cases, the appeals may well be considered together. The first appeal, that numbered 2494, is an appeal taken from an order substituting A. C. Holmberg, city clerk and city auditor of the city of Santa Barbara as defendant, in the place and stead of Alfred Davis, the former city clerk and auditor. The second appeal, that numbered 2440, is an appeal taken from an order directing the clerk of the superior court to collect a warrant for a sum of money drawn by the city clerk and auditor and deposited in court to await the result of a former appeal.

In December, 1909, Davis was city clerk and auditor of the city of Santa Barbara, and the city of Santa Barbara was at that time indebted in a considerable sum to Warren W. Clark. The Ott Hardware Company having obtained a judgment in the superior court against Clark, sought to intercept this money due from the city to Clark by having filed with the city clerk and auditor, agreeable to the provisions of section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.