Cook

Griggs v. Cook

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 551·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 694·289 P. 693
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1930Docket No. 7244.California433 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued for damages as the result of a fall upon premises leased by plaintiff from the defendant. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. Findings and judgment were entered for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals on typewritten transcripts.

Some time after plaintiff had leased the premises and while she was residing thereon the city of Oakland graded and paved the street in front of the premises and constructed a sidewalk. In doing this work the grade of the street and sidewalk was lowered so that an embankment was left from twelve to fourteen inches high along the front of the premises where the property line abutted the sidewalk. This condition remained for about two months, during which time plaintiff and her family passed in and out of the premises daily crossing this embankment at the driveway. On March 31, 1927, while plaintiff was leaving the premises she stepped upon this embankment at the property line. The embankment had become unstable and disintegrated from winter rains and gave way to plaintiff’s weight, causing the injuries complained of.

The only point raised on the appeal is that the trial court should have given a different judgment. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.