Goatman

Goatman v. Pacific Ready-Cut Homes Inc.

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 397·297 P. 68
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 1931Docket No. 7725.California1,894 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Parker, J.

The action results from a disagreement between the parties over the construction of the terms of a certain bond executed by defendant Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, as principal, and defendant Standard Accident Insurance Company, as surety, and plaintiff as obligee.

There is little, if any, dispute as to the facts and the due execution and delivery of the bond. The defendant Pacific Ready-Cut Homes Company, hereinafter called the builder, had entered into an agreement with one Lawrence Law by the terms of which the said company was to build upon a certain lot a building described as of the double stucco type. The said Lawrence Law was the owner of the lot upon which the said building was to be erected. After the work of construction had commenced the said Law applied to the plaintiff Goatman for a loan, offering as security a mortgage on the lot together with the building to be erected. Plaintiff was willing to make the loan, as requested, but desired some further assurance or protection to the end that there would be no delay, cessation or abandonment of the work of construction. Accordingly Goatman approached the builder and explained his situation' and what he desired in the way of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.