Atowich

Atowich v. Zimmer

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 193·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 990·18 P.2d 370
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1933Docket No. 8748.California788 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Knight, J.

The defendants appeal from an order relieving plaintiffs from default in failing to file timely request for a transcript on an appeal taken by plaintiffs pursuant to section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure from a judgment on the merits theretofore rendered against them in the above action.

We find no merit in the appeal. The determination of the question of whether a party shall be relieved from his default must be left almost entirely to the discretion of the trial court, and it is only in exceptional cases that orders granting such relief will be reversed. Aside from the foregoing general rule, it is well settled that failure to file request for the preparation of the transcript within the statutory time is not jurisdictional to the appeal (Lynch v. Coe, 203 Cal. 422 [264 Pac. 747]; Rubin v. Platt Music Co., 79 Cal. App. 756 [ 251 Pac. 243 ]; Tasker v. Warmer, 202 Cal. 445 [ 261 Pac. 474 ]); and the decisions show that a liberal policy has been consistently followed in sustaining the action of trial courts in relieving defaulting parties for failure to file such request within the statutory period. For illustration, it has been definitely held that no formal application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.