Dornberg

Dornberg v. Frank Meline Co., Inc.

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 630·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1239·9 P.2d 306
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 15, 1932Docket No. 8234.California950 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Tuttle, J.

This is an action to recover a share of commissions from a real estate transaction. Judg ment in the sum of $5,812 was rendered for plaintiffs. The appeal is from the judgment.

One S. A. Kenoyer was the owner of a hotel in Oklahoma. He was the client of respondents, who were licensed real estate brokers. Appellant was also a licensed real estate broker, representing Joseph Schenck, who was the owner of California Building in Los Angeles. Respondents and appellant arranged a trade of these properties, and this trade was fully consummated. The trial court found that the parties orally agreed that each should charge his client the prevailing realty board commissions and that they would pool what commissions were received and split the same two ways; that the total realty board commissions in the transaction were $28,375, being composed of the following: $8,375 cash received by plaintiffs from Kenoyer, $5,000 in cash received by appellant from Schenck, and the equity in the Oklahoma property received by appellant at the admitted value of $15,000; that this equity was traded by appellant for Los Angeles property valued at $35,000; that plaintiffs were entitled to the difference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.