Vance

Tidewater Southern Ry. Co. v. Vance

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 420·31 Cal. App. 503·160 P. 1097
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 1916Civ. No. 1804.California1,134 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action brought to recover the sum of $625, alleged to be due upon a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant to the Tidewater Southern Railroad Company and by it assigned and transferred to the plaintiff herein.

The facts of the case are undisputed. On December 14, 1911, the defendant executed a subscription for five hundred shares of the capital stock of the Tidewater Southern Railroad Co., for which he agreed to pay $625 on or before ten months after date, giving his promissory note for that amount. The authorized agent of the corporation who solicited and received the subscription had two copies thereof, one marked “Original” and the other “Duplicate,” both of which were signed by the defendant and the agent on behalf of the corporation, the original being retained by him for the company and the duplicate being delivered to the defendant. On the back of the duplicate the following memorandum was written: “Dec. 4, ’ll. Ten months after date if holder of this contract is for any reason dissatisfied we agree to return note or cash equivalent.—H. C. Coffin, Tidewater Southern Railroad Co.” This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.