Luchini

Luchini v. Roux

Bad Law
29 Cal. App. 755·157 P. 554
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 1916Civ. No. 1573.California1,784 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, who was a dairyman, upon two causes of action for the recovery of the sum of $1,609.55. The first was for the sum of $1,339.49 upon an account stated, and was based upon the sale of milk, wood, horses, hogs, and hay. The second was for milk delivered to the defendants by plaintiff at an agreed price of $270.06.

Defendants, who were cheese manufacturers, in answer to the first cause of action, denied that an account was ever stated, or that they ever promised to pay the plaintiff any balance due; and further denied that there was due from them any sum whatever upon the second cause of action.

As a separate and distinct defense to both counts, defendants alleged that the plaintiff had no legal capacity to sue upon or maintain the alleged cause of action, for the reason that he had failed to comply with the provisions of sections 6 and 16 of the so-called Dairy Act, requiring those engaged in the dairy business to register as provided by the act; and that the sales, in so far as the milk was concerned, were wrongful within the meaning of the act, and that no recovery could be had therefor.

The court found that the milk respecting which an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.