Tasker

Tasker v. Nieto

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 135·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 148·291 P. 688
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1930Docket No. 4121.California5,475 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

Judgment was entered in this action in favor of the respondent, Fanny R. Cunningham, and against the plaintiff and the defendants, Nieto. From this judgment the defendants Nieto appeal.

The plaintiff began this action to quiet title to certain property situate in the city and county of Los Angeles, described as follows, to wit: “The northerly portion of Lot 81, Leonis Tract, deed book 824, pages 123-126, records of Los Angeles County, having a frontage of 24.95 feet on the westerly side of Utah street, and being 21 feet at the westerly end, 123.60 feet at the southerly side, and 106 feet at the northerly side.” The defendants Nieto, and the respondents Cunningham answered, claiming title to the property described in the complaint, and respectively praying for judgment in their favor.

At the conclusion of the trial the court made the following findings, omitting such portions as are not material:

From these findings the court drew its conclusions of law that the defendant Fanny It. Cunningham was entitled to a decree quieting her title to said property against the claims of the plaintiff and the other defendants in this action, and enjoining and debarring them from asserting any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.