Kriebel

Newark Trust Co. v. Kriebel

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 231·49 Cal. App. 614·193 P. 962
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1920Civ. No. 3468.California3,957 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the judgment for defendants and enter judgment for plaintiff on the findings. A jury was impaneled advisory to the court and found certain facts which the court adopted in its findings and also returned a general verdict in favor of the defendant Phillips, and the court gave judgment in her favor. Plaintiff did not appeal from this judgment, but now appeals from an order denying its motion to vacate the judgment in favor of defendant and to enter judgment for plaintiff on the findings. Consequently, the only question before this court is whether or not the conclusions of law are consistent with and supported by the findings of fact.

The action was brought upon a promissory note for ten thousand dollars, given by defendant Phillips in renewal of a note for the same amount. The original note was given in June, 1913, to defendant Kriebel, as trustee for the Rector Automatic Radiator Company, a corporation to be formed in the future. This note had attached to it a collateral agreement pledging certain stock as security therefor. The court submitted to the jury four special interrogatories, which were answered by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.