Kupfer

Lynch v. Kupfer

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 652·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 168·26 P.2d 33
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 1933Docket No. 681.California1,412 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

On August 11, 1928, the defendant conveyed to the plaintiff certain lots in Newport Beach, according to the recorded map or plat thereof. Thereafter, the plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to a tract of land lying between the lots as described in the deed and the line of ordinary high tide of the Pacific Ocean in Newport Bay. In her answer the defendant alleged that she was the owner of this additional land and asked that her title thereto be quieted. The court found in favor of the defendant and from a judgment quieting her title the plaintiff has appealed.

The appellant introduced no oral testimony and relies entirely upon two exhibits received in evidence as establishing title in himself. The first of these is the above-mentioned deed executed by the respondent purporting to convey to the appellant certain lots as designated on the map. The other exhibit is the judgment-roll in a former action in which the city of Newport Beach was plaintiff and in which the parties to the present action, with others, were the defendants. In that action the court fixed the line of ordinary high tide of the Pacific Ocean in Newport Bay and adjudged and decreed that this respondent was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.