Sheftel

Murphy v. Sheftel

Caution
121 Cal. App. 533·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1250·9 P.2d 568
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 1932Docket No. 8172.California2,746 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

As theresult of negotiations which commenced in February, 1926, plaintiffs in April of the same year purchased from defendants a lot fronting on Washington Street in San Francisco upon which was situated a three-story frame building containing fifteen two-room apartments, and paid therefor the sum of $55,000. Previous to the transfer to plaintiffs the premises had been leased by defendants for a term of years commencing on March 1, 1926, to a tenant, who agreed to pay a monthly rental of $502.50. The court found that plaintiffs in April, 1926, through the lessee mentioned, entered into possession of the premises. In June, 1926, plaintiffs served upon defendants a notice of rescission, claiming that the condition of the building had been misrepresented, that the same contained certain latent defects of which they were unaware at the time of the purchase and which defendants concealed.

The complaint alleged as a first cause of action that during the negotiations defendants falsely and fraudulently represented “(a) that the laminated girder in the basement of the building, which was partially exposed to view during the negotiations, was constructed of six planks each 2"xl4" of 10'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.